When we began our project in February 2011 we decided to follow Tim’s recommended method of skin fold testing combined with using a simple Body Tape Measure to calculate both body fat percentage and total inches.
We did this along with the conventional means of stepping on the scale.
In order to track our progress and remain consistent we also have taken photos and discussed our workout regimens.
As Tim mentions in the 4-Hour Body: “Starting any body recomposition program without measurements is like planning a trip without a start address.”
My sister, Jennifer has gone on to lose over 100 pounds (something I will be talking more about later this week). We made the decision to forgo any “formal” body fat testing until she had reached a milestone. Dropping below 200 pounds for the first time since high school was that milestone!
This last week we were invited by our local hospital, as well as my gracious sister, to participate in and videotape the process of underwater weighing as well as the formal calculation of resting metabolic rate.
The question we wanted to answer was how do these more formal methods compare with the do it at home methods we had been using? At $155 this was not a cheap process and prior to attending the session I felt it may be a waste of money. But the information we received was invaluable.
It was invaluable because it helped Jennifer to nail in a long term goal… One, that not surprisingly, was quite different than what you would find with more conventional calculations.
Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR), and the closely related Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR), is the amount of daily energy expended by humans and other animals at rest.
It is used to determine the amount of daily calories a person would need to maintain essential body functions.
Basal metabolism is usually by far the largest component of total caloric expenditure.
However, the equations used to calculate this are only approximate and variation in BMR (reflecting varying body composition), in physical activity levels, and in energy expended in thermogenesis make it difficult to estimate the dietary consumption any particular individual needs in order to maintain body weight.
Yet, in a world of calorie-in-calorie-out thinking these types of tests are still considered valuable.
The measurement process takes about 10 minutes.
The goal here is to find out how many calories you are burning at complete rest.
The clinic used a specialized device to determine resting metabolic rate by measuring oxygen uptake. This data is meant to provide information for weight management, fitness training and optimal health.
To the right is an info graphic and the results of Jennifer’s testing (click image to enlarge)
How does this compare to our own calculations using our 4-Hour Body Excel Spreadsheet for taking measurements? Here are our home measurements that day:
The first step was a basic 5 point skinfold measurement, then we preceded to the dunk tank.
Underwater weighing is based upon Archimedes Principle which states that the buoyant force on a submerged object is equal to the weight of the fluid that is displaced by the object.
It is generally regarded as the “gold standard” for body composition analysis, although this claim is being made less of late because of newer and more sophisticated procedures.
Because body fat is less dense than water, it increases one’s buoyancy while the fat-free mass, which has a density greater than water, makes one sink.
After correcting for residual volume–which increases buoyancy and decreases the underwater weight–percent fat can be calculated based on the underwater weight.
The largest source of error in underwater weighing is thought to be the determination of residual volume (RV; the amount of air remaining in the lungs following maximal expiration).
When RV is estimated rather than measured, the precision of underwater weighing is little better than anthropometric (skinfold) determination.
To perform underwater weighing, Jennifer was first weighed on dry land. Next she had to get into a large tank of water.
While sitting on a special scale, she was lowered underwater and asked to expel all the air from her lungs and remain motionless while the underwater weight was measured.
This appears a lot easier than it was.
This procedure was repeated five times and averaged.
The examiner then used a special calculation to determine lean weight and fat weight. He presented these at the end of our morning session.
At the end of the visit we sat down to review the results. Below are some of the data sheets we were given.
I have included a comparison against our own tracking results.
I am proud to say we weren’t that far off. In fact the difference between our calculated TDEE (Total daily energy expenditure) and those of the examiner were about 200 kcal.
This difference I personally feel to be insignificant. But if you ask Jennifer it is the difference between long term success and failure.
The difference in body fat calculations between ours (based on skin caliper testing) and the underwater weighing was about 4%.
In-Office Skinfold Measurements |
Home Skinfold Measurements with calculated BMR, BMI, TDEE, Body Fat% and total Inches. Using Excel Spreadsheet |
(Click on individual images to enlarge)
Goal: 22% Body Fat | Goal: 24% Body Fat |
I am not going to get into a discussion here about thermodynamics, calories and the various theories behind weight loss. We can do that in the comments section if you would like.
But I will say this:
The RMR testing is useful in combination with home calorie counting for a brief period of time. Apps such as Daily Burn, MyFitnessPal and MyNetDiary are a good way to do this. You will learn about food, nutrition, caloric content, fat, protein… etc. etc. It is nice to relate this to your own body metrics and will bring these concepts home.
The underwater body fat analysis was valuable and I consider this to be an important metric. This of course can be done far cheaper especially if you have access to a BodPod.
When I asked Jennifer if she thought it was worth it she had no doubt in her mind.
I think this comes from the confidence of knowing that your body metrics were calculated by a true professional and not just a family member pinching you with calipers once a month.
What are your thoughts on the value of this type of testing? Do you think it is necessary? Is it worth the high cost?
You can sign up to receive updates via RSS or email. If you like what you read let us know it truly helps!
We started with 6 people and 5 months later there is a dedicated core of 3. Regimented monthly tracking like many things in life, can be difficult in a time-constrained world. Goals tend to wax, wane and then change. I am extremely proud of my sister and brother in law who have been huge motivators to me to keep this project going. They are in the photos below.
I am going to talk a bit today about what detailed tracking has taught me over the last 5 months. Also, I have given the 4-Hour Body dietary protocol to well over 50 patients in my practice (and counting). We have only the resources of time to track weight in my clinic. I have been carefully tracking their progress as well. Today as I look at our photos and crunch our numbers I realize why most of my patients have stopped the slow carb diet protocol.
Weight is an extremely poor indicator of the body composition changes one achieves with a healthy change in diet and moderate exercise. You will see this as you read further.
I was going to discuss both my patient outcomes and our individual tracking today, but I have decided to split this into two posts and simply discuss our results here.
Stephen |
Jennifer |
Patrick |
5-2-2011 | 5-2-2011 | 5-2-2011 |
Weight: 162 Body Fat: 15.2% BMI: 25.7 kCal BMR: 1716 kCal Total Inches: 140 Resting HR: 78 Blood Pressure: 128/88 TDEE: 2659 |
Weight: 243 Body Fat: 43.79% BMI: 43.04 Total Inches: 179.25 TDEE: 2761 kCal BMR: 2008 kCal |
Weight: 200 Body Fat: 32.8 BMI: 31.32 Total Inches: 158.6 BMR: 1666 kCal TDEE: 2513 kCal |
10-1-2011 | 10-1-2011 | 10-1-2011 |
Weight: 163 Body Fat %: 15.7 HR: 64 BMI: 25.9 Total Inches: 141.5 TDEE: 2659 kCal BMR: 1715 kCal Blood Pressure: 112/68 |
Weight: 214 Body Fat %: 39.87 BMI: 36.86 Total Inches: 176.43 BMR: 1890 kCal TDEE: 2599 kCal |
Weight: 195 Body Fat %: 25.4 BMI: 30.5 Total Inches: 151.25 BMR: 1795 kCal TDEE: 2783 kCal |
Month 5 Review |
Month 5 Review | Month 5 Review |
Weight: +1 Body Fat Change: –.5 HR: –14 bpm BMI: +0.2 Total Inches: +1.5
|
Weight Total: –29 lbs Body Fat Change: – 3.92% BMI Change: – 3.5 Total Inches Change: –2.82 TDEE: – 162 cal*C-Reactive Protein: – 50 |
Weight Total: – 5 lbs. Body Fat Change: – 7.4% BMI Change: – 0.82 Total Inches: –7.35 BMR change: + 129 TDEE: + 270 |
Lifestyle and Protocol | Exercise Protocol | Exercise Protocol |
|
|
|
Supplementation | Supplementation | Supplementation |
|
|
|
You can review all my data including photos and full excel spreadsheets here. You can see those of Jennifer and Patrick here.
I think the above data is very interesting. I highlighted some of what struck me most.
I am going to briefly touch on our findings here:
Stephen (me)
Many people have emailed me and been surprised at how “disappointing” my results have been. But this is where I beg to differ. Now, to be honest my last month was very poor as my family was on vacation for 3 weeks. And during this time I negated quite a bit of my gains (I will not go into the gory details). In fact my body fat percentage increased almost 1% from the previous month. But regardless of this, after 5 months of easing into my routine this is what I have really gained:
Prior to beginning this process and reading the 4-Hour Body I did not even know where to begin to learn how to take body fat measurements and I had never heard of a Jackson-Pollock 7-point method. In fact I still think of art history when I hear this. But getting the tools and getting started was the key. Don’t wait, get some good inexpensive skin calipers and use our excel spreadsheet to track yourself. You will enjoy the process, get some friends to join you or your kids. My daughter in the photo loves our measurement days. If you want some accountability send me your data I will be happy to post it for you and our community will cheer you on!
Kettlebell’s, all new for me as well, Bosu ball… I love it, never had heard of it. Occam’s Protocol, focusing on less carbs, Alpha Lipoic Acid… These were all new for me. I really have to hand it to Tim here, he has helped me in so many ways.
Many people will tell you that you don’t need to track yourself to get good results and they are absolutely right. But, it does not have to be obsessive and if you approach it the right way it is fun. This last measurement has gotten me off my butt again and my brother in law who was extremely discouraged by his lackluster weight loss was delighted to see he had a 7% reduction in body fat.
All in all I am happy where this journey has taken me thus far. Even writing this blog post is a pleasant surprise.
Best wishes to everyone out there on your road to better health!
]]>
Pat (P90X) Day 1 vs. 30 | Jennifer (P90X) Day 1 vs. 30 | Stephen (4HB) Day 1 vs. 24 |
See Data Table | See Data Table | See Data Table |
To be honest I am blown away by the results of the P90X program. But I am not surprised. If you are not familiar with P90X then you may not be aware of just how intense the program actually is.
But trust me it is intense. Six days a week one hour per day and that is just the part where you are actually working out. With set up and prep time this requires a certain amount of dedication that goes far beyond 4 hours.
The diet plan is similar to what we see with most of the “hot” fitness products right now. Cutting the carbs, focusing on lean protein and increasing fiber rich foods/vegetables. But with P90X as many of you may know there is a strong emphasis on exercise along with the diet portion of the program.
It is interesting to see how each of our body types has responded to the specific programs. I am actually at week 3 of Occam’s Protocol and have had a 1% decrease in my body fat percentage and a small increase in my total inches. I am not sure what I was expecting, but I was happy with the results.
Stephen (4HB) Month 1: | Stephen (4HB) Month 2: |
Fat %: 15.2% | Fat %: 14.9% |
BMI: 25.75 | BMI: 25.75 |
BMR: 1716 kCal | BMR: 1720 kCal |
Total Inches: 140 | Total Inches: 141.5 |
Lean Body Mass: 137 | Lean Body Mass: 138 |
I have learned a lot in just 3 weeks while implementing the principles of the 4 Hour Body. Occam’s Protocol has been a wonderful adjustment to my routine. Mostly because I have only been to the gym 2 times per week for 15-20 minutes and have actually made real gains.
If you are beginning the Protocol I would suggest this:
Now stop reading and get out there and do your routine! Check out a full report on our stats and updates at www.fourhourbodyversusbeachbody.com. Drop us a comment or a question, especially if you are using any (or all of) these methods. We would love to hear about your progress as well.
You can sign up to receive updates via RSS or email or join us on Facebook
]]>
Total these numbers to arrive at your Total Inches (TI). Changes in this total will be meaningful enough to track.
I have created a special 4 hour body “BODY MEASUREMENT WORKSHEET”. Take your time to record this data, it will act as a guide as you begin your diet. I recommend that you return here instead of the scale to track your progress.
_____________________________________________
Step II. Estimate your body-fat (BF%) based on the “Eyeballing It” slider (or use the above Excel spreadsheet with skinfold calipers)
The American Council on Exercise uses the following categories based on percentage of body fat:
_____________________________________________
Professional Resources:
_____________________________________________
Tim’s Recommended Tools for Body Composition:
Related Posts:
Body Analysis Links:
[note color=”#f5f8fa”]You can sign up to receive updates via RSS or email or check out the upcoming 4 Hour University. If you are feeling especially generous and any of this info helped you please share with a like, it makes me feel happy and that should in turn make you feel happy
[/note]
]]>